Susan Miller

Susan Miller

For Newsom, the science didn’t change, but the economics and politics sure did. The Democrats may have to give up their big-spending dreams and the pension funds could start circling the drain.

DOJ gave Newsom stern warning over church closings. “Simply put, there is no pandemic exception to the U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights,”

Darrell Issa and Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against Newsom for his all vote by mail order for Nov. election.

Americanism – Let’s Celebrate Being Americans…2,000 different ways!

In 1870, Congress set aside four days of celebration, officially giving federal employees time off. Those holidays were New Year’s Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas. Since Americans love to celebrate life, and capitalism loves to find a way to create wealth, the list has steadily grown to include 10 major (government-closed) Holidays…and thousands of others.  The Federal Holidays have obvious reasons for celebration, but where do all of the other crazy holidays that you hear about come from?  

A quick study of various lists reveals there are 17 additional major days of Observance (e.g. Valentines Day, Mother’s Day), over 140 special interest days (e.g. Groundhog Day), 90+ Historical Holidays, and….well…around 2,000 ‘other’ holidays that fill the official list.

Categories from the ‘anything goes’ list include just about every aspect of life experience. A quick preview of a single day from https://NationalDayCalendar.com/

shows six reasons to celebrate on May 20th; Emergency Medical Services for Children Day; Quiche Lorraine Day; National Pick Strawberries Day, Be a Millionaire Day, Juice Slush Day, and Rescue Dog Day.  Like I said…anything goes. 

Perhaps the most notable back-story surrounding the Holiday frenzy is Mother’s day. It was brought to National prominence in the early 1900’s by Ann Jarvis. She turned its promotion into a lifelong mission (and struggle).  She became very protective of ‘her’ holiday, even signing all of her personal letters as…”Ann Jarvis, Founder of Mother’s Day” and continuing to fight any inkling of creeping commercialism. She literally considered Mother’s Day her own intellectual and legal property, spawning dozens of lawsuits fighting the holiday’s commercialism. A 1944 Newsweek article reported that she had 33 simultaneous lawsuits.

A prime example of her battle was the White Carnation. It was her Mother’s favorite flower, so Anna declared it the ‘official’ flower of Mother’s Day. Jarvis noted, “The Carnation does not drop its petals, but hugs them to its heart as it dies, and so, too, mothers hug their children to their hearts, their mother love never dying.”  When it became apparent that Carnations had become a cottage industry as a favored gift for Mother’s Day, she officially dropped them as the emblem and adopted a printed button instead.

Her mission to create an everlasting holiday continued its descent into a battle against the inevitable. The commercial juggernaut chipped away at her sacred day. Spoiler alert; she lost the battle. Mother’s Day is currently a 23 Billion per year cash cow.

Anyone can now create a Holiday, and for just about any reason. Create one yourself right now. Just go to https://www.NationalDayArchives.com/application/

….and…of course, pay a small fee. Federal holidays require an act of Congress. But a President can issue an executive order for a one-time holiday any time he wants. Any votes out there for a national ‘End of COVID Lockdown’ day? Let’s celebrate!

Americanism – Meet Typhoid Mary…and then please wash your hands.

Everyone knows the story of Tokyo Rose, the infamous broadcaster who did her best to wreak psychological havoc on the Pacific troops of World War II. But 40 years before she arrived on the scene, another feminine anti-hero entered the psyche of Americans everywhere.  

Mary Mallon had emigrated from Ireland to the US in the 1890’s, and got a job as a cook for a wealthy New York banker.  In about a week’s time, 6 of the 11 household members came down with Typhoid, which had a mortality rate of 10%. 

Mary moved from house to house as a cook, infecting each of the families she worked with, leaving a string of sickness and death in her trail. But she wasn’t connecting the dots. She felt fine, being our Nation’s first discovery of what was then called a ‘healthy carrier.” 

It took a detective named George Soper, hired by one of the families, to sleuth out the true root cause of the mysterious string of illnesses.  Soper had previously been hired by the government to investigate outbreaks, earning him the title of ‘epidemic fighter.’ He quickly recognized Mary as a common thread. He stalked Mary in Manhattan, repeatedly trying to obtain samples of her feces, urine and blood.  She refused, and kept chasing him away (one time with a carving knife in hand). 

Soper’s tenacity would end up showing America how a single unwitting carrier could be the base cause of widespread disease outbreaks. He found a trail of 22 people that were directly infected by Mary, some of whom died.  She was eventually arrested, forced to give stool samples, and was found to test positive for Salmonella, the root cause of Typhoid Fever. She was quarantined against her will, but successfully sued for release, and ended up cooking again in public kitchens, continuing to spread the deadly disease. By some estimates, Mary was ultimately responsible for about 3,000 cases of Typhoid. Mary still refused to believe she was a carrier and was placed back in quarantine for over 20 years, imprisoned until her death.  

She became stigmatized with a name that would ring throughout the next century. “Typhoid Mary” became the butt of jokes, cartoons, and public ridicule. “Typhoid Mary” even appeared in medical dictionaries, as a disease carrier. It also became an oft-used term for anyone who brings bad luck, male or female, as in; “That guy is such a typhoid Mary; everything has gone wrong since he showed up.”

Way back when, there was no talk of total societal shutdown as pandemics loomed and diseases seemed to run rampant. It was just dealt with as part of life and we all lived with the fact that polio, scarlet fever, measles, etc., could take their toll on us and our loved ones.  

It takes a great leader to safely guide a country and its people through dangerous times. We’re covered in that regard!  It also takes common sense. You’re probably sick of hearing it, but the most basic preventative measure would have made a big difference 100 years ago. If Typhoid Mary had simply washed her hands several times a day, lives would have been saved. Stay safe! 

Trump’s Triumphs: Know What You Don’t Know.
 
Not knowing is difficult. But knowing what you don’t know is important for making decisions about the future. There’s much we don’t know about Coronovirus. Acknowledging what we don’t know can help us plan amidst the onslaught of news, fake or otherwise. 
 
How many Americans have died from COVID-19? We don’t know. The virus mostly affects those with compromised health and the elderly. Though it may sound cold to say so, some Coronavirus suffers would’ve died anyway. A cancer patient, for example, may contract pneumonia in his last days. Should doctors list the cause as cancer or pneumonia or both? The doctor’s choice informs the statistics. Therefore, the only way to tell the virus’ true impact the US death rate is to compare the number of deaths from all causes before and after the presence of the virus. Even if the percentage of deaths associated with COVID-19 goes up, the “excess deaths” reveal the true impact. 
 
According to the CDC, the average number of deaths per day from all causes in 2019 was 7708. This number skews higher during flu season than in the summer when the numbers trend lower. 7708 people per day equals an average of 53,963 per week- approximately 54,000.
 
Attached is a link to the CDC’s US weekly death count from all causes compared to the combined percentage of those who died from flu, pneumonia or COVID-10.  A chart on this page indicates a shocking leap in deaths attributed to COVID-19. Yet, below it lies a chart telling a more benign story - the chart of deaths per week beginning with Week 40 in 2019 and ending with Week 16 of 2020.  At the end of December (week 52, 2019), 58,133 people died in the US or about 4 thousand above average, with 6.4% from respiratory issues. Though the flu season was considered rough, the above average total raised no red flags at the time. Interestingly, the “all causes” total gradually lessens (53,238 by Week 12) while the percentage of those dying of respiratory issues rises  to 9% by Week 12.  Week 14, 2020, spiked to a peak of 60,324 at 19.9%. One might think the chart shows Coronavirus having a devastating impact. But look closely at the numbers…the number of “excess deaths” was literally 0 in the 3 weeks prior to the spike. Then suddenly,  the total drops precipitously to half the average as Week 16 counts only 28,483 deaths.  Yes, in the middle of this crisis, we experienced the anticipated deaths from all causes dropped by half.
 
What does that mean? Who knows? Perhaps people who would’ve died anyway died weeks or months sooner thanks to COVID-19. Or because everyone stayed home fewer people caught the virus or died in car accidents. Or perhaps the count is an aberration.
 
Tracking the percentage of respiratory deaths provokes questions.  The percentage for Week 40, 2020, was 5.2 percent. That number slowly climbs to 9%, jumps to 12.8% in Week 13 and peaks at 23.6% in Week 15, lessening to 18.6% in week 16. 
 
Now think about what that means. Using a death rate of approximately 54,000 as a norm, Week 15 shows only 2000 deaths above average while attributing 12.6% to COVID. That means close to 11, 000 people died from respiratory issues whose deaths might been attributed to other causes in different circumstances.  In Week 16, the “all causes” total suddenly drops by half. Yet, 5304 or 18.6% were attributed to the virus. That means only about 23,000 people died from other causes. 
 
Why have deaths from other causes diminished while the percentage dying of COVID rises? Could the data be skewed by doctors reporting false cases? Or skewed by doctors attributing what might previously been attributed to cancer or other causes to COVID- 19? Since the government pays up to $39,000 per COVID ventilator patient, there’s certainly incentive.  But all we really know is the numbers look odd. 
 
What else don’t we know? We don’t know how many people have had the virus or have developed antibodies without ever showing symptoms. If it turns out, as some now think, that the disease was present in the US in December (part of that difficult flu season), the death toll from the virus may be less than we now think. Currently, CDC figures indicate between 5 to 6% of those who tested for the virus die. But as more Americans get tested, that number might revise down to 1 or 2% - still 10 times worse than a typical flu - but not the catastrophe the current numbers indicate. 
 
President Trump knows what he doesn’t know. When the first US case appeared, he took instant action. Back then, experts knew very little about the virus. He and other world leaders relied on the now famous Oxford University study that projected 2 million Americans dead. But now that the president has seen how the virus functions and how both the medical profession relays information about it, he’s urging the country to take precautions but get back to business. 
 
If anything, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown two things: 1) that ultimately, like it or not, perhaps within our children’s lifetime, a world order will materialize, and 2) that right now borders matter, especially to the US, perhaps more than ever before.
 
To protect its citizens from danger, a country - state, town, individuals standing 6 feet apart and wearing N95 surgical masks - must retain the right to wall off and defend themselves. Yet simultaneously, the Earth needs to operate as a unit - sharing information, supplies and techniques - while respecting the choices, cultural and otherwise, of the humans inhabiting it. 
 
Over time, the internet, technologies yet to be fully implemented (like blockchain currency), and technologies still to be invented, gradually will reduce the influence of national cultures and government control.  As the world has discovered recently en masse, it’s just as easy to study yoga from a teacher in Australia as with the neighborhood yogi. Though the human condition won’t go away - people will still pray, love, lie, cheat and fall ill - world values will gradually homogenize. But they are far from homogeneous now - and therefore, those countries that serve as a beacon of hope to the world must take steps to protect their way of life.

In the Heritage Foundation’s “The Trouble with Nationalism,” Kim Holmes explains that unlike nationalism based on cultural identity, “American exceptionalism…is grounded in America's founding principles: natural law, liberty, limited government, individual rights, the checks and balances of government, popular sovereignty…[and] the civilizing role of religion in civil society … We as Americans believe these principles are right and true for all peoples… Americans are different because our creed is both universal and exceptional at the same time. We are exceptional in the unique way we apply our universal principles.”

So as the internet and future technologies expose American values to the world over time, strong borders protect our culture, in addition to protecting our health and economy. By bolstering this protection with exclusivity, we incentivize those who admire us to adopt our ways, whether they become citizens or spread the word in their home land.

According to WhiteHouse.gov, “The United States must adopt an immigration system that serves the national interest. To restore the rule of law and secure our border, President Trump is committed to constructing a border wall and ensuring the swift removal of unlawful entrants. To protect American workers, the President supports ending chain migration, eliminating the Visa Lottery, and moving the country to a merit-based entry system. These reforms will advance the safety and prosperity of all Americans while helping new citizens assimilate and flourish.” 
 
The policy is not anti-immigrant. Unlike pure economic conservatives who put financial gain above all, this administration seeks immigrants who not only contribute economically but also embrace our unique values and thereby preserve them.
 
In the classic movie Citizen Kane, the character Mr. Bernstein examines a ticker tape and declares, “It’s easy to make a lot of money, if all you want is to make a lot of money.” With respect to border policies, those who wish to make a lot of money want wide open borders - the definition of which is not “that anyone should be allowed into the country, no questions asked” but “that immigration should be based on the socio-economic needs of a country’s residents… Other than [rejecting individuals who pose a threat], who brings whom into the country and for what reason is none of [government’s] business.”(Heritage) 
 
The rich and powerful hope to exploit such a policy. Michelle Malkin, in “Open Borders Inc.: Who’s Funding America’s Destruction?” explores how “‘foreign and domestic enemies’—among them George Soros, Silicon Valley billionaires, and assorted ‘globalists’—are working together, under humanitarian cover, to throw open the nation’s gates” (New Yorker).  Why? Because, by destroying the values which make America an economic powerhouse, they cripple competition.
 
That powerful individuals and corporations, seeking government control, exploit the immigration issue is apparent in the Left’s extreme flip-flops. Traditionally, the Left has sought strict border control to protect labor. It’s only since President Obama, who abandoned the working class for Silicon Valley and identity politics, that the Left became schizophrenic - declaring there is no border crisis (and so no need for a wall), then a crisis so bad they claimed Trump built “state-sanctioned concentration camps,” and finally calling anyone, including Bernie Sanders (who, like Marx, opposes any open borders) a “nativist,” a word which activists made synonymous with racist.  Now after years of victimization by the Swamp, populists on both sides agree: “Today’s well-intentioned [Leftist] activists have become the useful idiots of big [multi-national] business.” 
 
President Trump, as a forward thinking leader who happens to owns country clubs, recognizes that borders do more than protect the economy, social services, and citizen’s health and safety. They remind the world that membership in our “club” of Exceptionalism, requires that one uphold and respect what truly unites our club members: the constitution and the rule of law. Race and creed don’t matter a jot.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
"Never waste a good crisis,” now Mayor of Chicago Rahm Emanuel famously said. If anything, the Coronavirus Pandemic has provided the media and left-wing establishment with great opportunities.  In researching this article, I discovered such a mass of conflicting information it made me want to throw up my hands and quit, but it no doubt made millions keep clicking in search of bias affirmation. For the first time in memory, the media has a chance to earn public trust, but instead seize the opportunity to spin. As for the Speaker and her House cohorts, they passed a bill providing roughly 4 times the funding requested by the president. At the time of this writing, summaries of the text are “in process.” But after wading through the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act” to see what is says, my view is that they’ve opened the door to economic upheaval that they hope will lead to a socialist revolt.  Moreover, as of today (3/23/20), according a White House public outreach email, the house dropped the president’s suggested stimulus package in favor of pushing a 1,110 page bill that, among other things, audits election results, reduces airline carbon emissions, establishes corporate diversity requirements, adds collective bargaining for federal workers and more. A great opportunity indeed. Hopefully, the senate will stop it. 
 
Now, let’s clear up fake news about President Trump’s response to Covid-19. According to the White House website and a separate press calendar, on January 22, the day after the first American contracted the virus, Trump told reporters he had a plan to combat it. On January 29, he announced a task force, which consists of members of his staff and heads of appropriate government entities, such as the CDC.  On January 31, he restricted travel with China. Thereafter, the team took weekly meeting with Trump and gave press updates. As of mid-Feburary, the president took daily, sometimes twice daily, meetings on Covid-19 with both government officials and private sector leaders. As of this writing, battling the virus occupies his day and his task force makes daily televised press briefings. 
 
So far, the president has: 1) restricted travel with China, Iran, South Korea, Europe,  and the UK, which applies to foreign nationals, not cargo; 2) pushed an economic assistance assistance package to help support businesses and workers who have been harmed by this outbreak; 3) instructed the Small Business Administration to exercise to provide loans to businesses affected by the coronavirus; 4) instructed the Department of the Treasury to defer tax payments for certain individuals and businesses negatively impacted by the coronavirus; 5) called on Congress to pass payroll tax relief, 6) declared a public health emergency, then a national state of emergency; 7) incentivized public/private development of therapeutics and vaccines to treat and prevent.  Working across the public and private sectors, the Trump Administration continues to expand testing capacity. More than 5 million tests have been distributed nationwide. The task force’s goal, as you may’ve seen is to pushed down the natural arc of the virus so that hospitals won’t be overwhelmed as in Italy.  Keeping the public home buys the government and medical concerns time to stockpile equipment and medicine. 
While critics attack Trump and Pence for delayed testing, a timeline posted on Fox News shows that, in fact, the president’s actions made up for CDC efforts to control the process.  On January 11, the Chinese posted the genetic code for the test. Within days, Australia developed a viable test. But the CDC insisted on creating their own, announcing it on January 24 and releasing on February 6. On 2/12, the CDC recalled these faulty tests. The FDA simultaneously prevented universities and private labs from creating their own tests. So, it wasn’t until the president got involved on 3/3 that the red tape dissolved and a public/private partnership was announced on 3/13. 
 
The House bill provides important necessities: coverage of co-pays for the insured, coverage of testing and care for the uninsured (the president donated his 4th quarter 100K salary to this), support and protection for health care workers and forbidding use of social security funds  But a few provisions are not only unnecessary, they subject our country - in particular, small businesses - to socialism until “the date on which the qualifying need related to a public health emergency concludes.”  Even a business with 1 employee must provide paid leave, for care-givers as well as the sick, and though owners can request government money, we know this requirement sets a precedent.  Oddly, the benefits extend beyond caregivers, but to victims of domestic violence (2 pages on this.) General benefits and accommodations need not just be posted but written into employee handbooks, which implies permanency beyond the crisis. Lastly, the bill was voted on quickly, with seemly little discussion. But the bill’s text, which consists mostly of arcane sentences such as “in sub-section B in the first sentence, by striking ‘and’ before ‘(10)” reveals the time and man-power required to truly understand it. 
 
During this time, straight facts may provide the only antidote to stress. Check out the links referenced below. 
In February, immigration expert Mark Kerkorian told us immigration would be a top issue in 2020. So, in the interest of fairness, and in this age of choosing news sources based on confirmation bias, our members might benefit from comparing and contrasting the president’s immigration policy as stated on his campaign site to those stated on websites for the top Democrat candidates.
 
President Trump’s policies are easy to picture and implement - provided his opponents give support. He wants a wall to secure the southern border, as well as “to close legal loopholes that enable illegal immigration, to end chain migration, and to eliminate the visa lottery program.” He “pulled the United States out of negotiations for a ‘Global Compact on Migration,’ a plan for global governance of immigration and a refugee policy that may have compromised U.S. sovereignty.” (Though he doesn’t say how the plan would compromise the US, that such a plan existed proves open borders is code one world order.) “In his first days in office, President Trump signed an executive order disqualifying sanctuary city from receiving federal grants.” He seeks a “transition to a merit-based immigration plan.”   He got Mexico to “deploy 6,000 national guard troops … to stop the immigration crisis, dismantle human-smuggling networks, and work more closely with the U.S. to share information about migrants.” In 2017/18, Trump’s administration arrested 14,000 gang members (6,000 of which were MS-13.) 
 
In short, Trump favors legal immigration and workers who would benefit the country’s future, as opposed to family members or lottery winners. His law and order approach asks the country to pass laws that make sense and then uphold them. 
 
The immigration policy of current front runner Bernie Sanders is so full of adjectives, passive verbs and insults, it’s hard to picture specific goals. He calls President Trump “a racist, a xenophobe, and a demagogue.” Among Bernie’s many ideas, he wants to: 1. “Put a moratorium on deportations until a thorough audit of current and past practices and policies is complete.” (How long will that take?);  2.“Stop all construction of the racist and ineffective wall (Are walls racist?) on the U.S.-Mexico Border and instead rely on cost-effective and innovative methods (Such as?) to counter the real threats of drug importation and human trafficking, not manufactured ones targeting the most vulnerable (Hmmm. Do real threats target those who are less vulnerable?); 3. Instruct DOJ to drop any litigation or funding restrictions relating to sanctuary cities;  4. Reverse President Trump’s attempts to end Temporary Protected Status agreements and extend TPS designations until a permanent solution is reached (When?); 5. Ensure all children who were separated from their families by the United States government are reunited swiftly (By whom? With whom?); 6. Convene a hemispheric summit with the leaders of Latin American countries who are experiencing migration crises and develop actionable steps to stabilize the region. 
 
Bernie’s last two points, plus the expansion of DACA and DAPA, are shared by all Democrat hopefuls. They want to paint Trump as a child abuser. And bizarrely, they want asylum seekers to site climate change as their reason for fleeing their homeland. 
Second place Mayor Pete’s 4 point system is phrased more politely than Bernie’s. He wants to: 1. "Promote belonging and democracy.” ( “Belonging” does not mean citizenship, it appears.);  2. “Modernize our immigration system.” (He provides a lengthy, wonky to-do list. Big government benefits big time); 3. “Protect the border and the people who arrive there.” (He seems to think the illegals need more protection from the US than our laws need upholding.); 4. “Engage with the global community.” This last point is also detailed at length: one world order equals no accountability. 
 
In Pete’s favor, he explains why immigration is necessary: "The United States has a population growth problem. In 2018, births hit a three-decade low. Our population is rapidly aging, and between now and 2027 we face a shortfall of eight million workers. Absent increases in immigration, GDP growth will decrease by 1.4 percent a year over the next decade.”  He adds, “Our undocumented population has grown because of an outdated immigration system and ill-conceived border enforcement policies. The gap between visa supply and demand is so large that we are, in effect, manufacturing and perpetuating the crisis.”  
 
Third place Amy Klobuchar’s policy appears non-existent. Her points focus on Dreamers, ICE and children put in cages. 
Joe Biden’s plan, like Pete’s, is specific and detailed but hard to picture. It expands bureaucracies large and small, at home and abroad. However, in his favor, it’s comprehensive, and he’s the only candidate who tackles root migration. So his policy reflects what appears to be more moderate leanings and reflects his experience as VP.
 
Trump’s common sense plan will appeal to those who value borders, law and merit based immigration. But decide for yourself - take a look at the sites below.
 
 
 
 
 

Convicted criminals let out of jail, making room for arrested restaurateurs, hairstylists, barbers, joggers, beachgoers and surfers.

Page 16 of 35